This is a registered order stating that the order in the main RFA No.1546 of 2021, State of Haryana vs. Rajinder Singh, is the governing order for this file. No reasoning or decision is elaborated in this document.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.1769 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.03.2022
State of Haryana
..Appellant (s)
Versus
Bimla Wati thr. her GPA and another
..Respondent (s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present����������������������������������� and Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate, Mr. M.K. Chouhan, Advocate, Mr. Rayhan Khan, Advocate, Mr. Abhay Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Vishal Bhateja, Advocate, Mr. Jashan Singh Sekhon, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Sindhu, Advocate, Mr. Viranjeet Singh Mahal, Advocate, Mr. Narender Singh Kamboj, Advocate, Mr. Dinesh Singh, Advocate, Mr. Pavinder Singh Bedi, Advocate, Mr. O.P. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate, Mr. Parmod Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Sonu Giri, Advocate, Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Dhiman, Advocate for the landowners. ***
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral)
For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA
No.1546 of 2021 , titled as State of Haryana and another vs. Rajinder Singh.
11.03.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2022.04.04 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
State of Haryana
Bimla Wati
Anil Kshetarpal
Ashok Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
