The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a civil revision petition upon satisfying the court that possession of the demised premises had been handed over to the respondents.
Permission to withdraw the civil revision petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
202
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 444 of 2019 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 10.03.2022
Sandeep Gupta
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sadhu Ram Gupta and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Govind Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the respondent No.1 to 3.
None for the respondent No.4 to 6.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
March 10, 2022 “DK”
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.03.14 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sandeep Gupta
Sadhu Ram Gupta and Others
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
