Allowed

Nigam Walia v. Anupma Walia

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Sept 2022FAO-M/63/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a matrimonial appeal, the High Court observed that the parties compromised the matter. The court modified the impugned divorce decree, directing the appellant to pay Rs.5 lacs as full and final settlement to the appellant's son instead of the previously awarded amount.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was disposed of with the impugned decree modified to direct a lump sum payment of Rs.5 lacs to the son.

Nigam Walia Vs Anupma Walia — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

FAO-M-63-2008

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

FAO-M-63-2008 (O&M) Date of decision:- 16.09.2022

Nigam Walia

....Appellant

vs.

Anupam Walia

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Harish Goyal, Advocate for the appellant.

¶12

Mr. P.K. Chugh, Advocate for the respondent.

¶13

¶14

Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral)

¶15

The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 17.11.2007 passed by ADJ (Adhoc)/Fast Track Court Ambala whereby the appellant was granted decree of divorce with the condition that he will pay Rs.2,30,000/- along with interest @ 18 percent w.e.f March, 1999.

¶16

At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant (who is present in the Court) states that the appellant is ready to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards full and final settlement. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the

¶17

above offer.

¶18

In view of the above, the appellant is directed to pay through RTGS of Rs.5,00,000/- in the account of the son of the parties namely Anmol (date of birth-02.12.1993), who has attained majority. This amount

¶19

GAURAV ARORA 2022.09.26 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶20

FAO-M-63-2008

¶21

¶22

shall be paid within a period of one month.

¶23

Learned counsel for the respondent is directed to share account no of the son of the parties so that the appellant can transfer the above amount in the account of his son through RTGS within a period of one month.

¶24

Statement of the appellant is also recorded to this effect and the same is taken on record as Annexure A-1.

¶25

In view of the fact that the matter stands compromised between the parties, the present appeal is disposed of and judgment and decree dated 17.11.2007 passed by ADJ (Adhoc)/Fast Track Court Ambala is modified to the extent that the appellant will pay lump sum of Rs.5 lacs as full and final payment in the account of his son instead of Rs.2,30,000/- along with 18 percent interest w.e.f March, 1999, which was granted to the respondentwife.

¶26

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 16.09.2022 (NIDHI GUPTA) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶27

GAURAV ARORA 2022.09.26 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Nigam Walia v. Anupma Walia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nigam Walia v. Anupma Walia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs Chetna Rani Gupta and Others

Sharmila Vs Bedpal

Gurlal Singh Vs State of Punjab

Aabida Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Kulwinder Singh @ Kinda Vs State of Punjab and Others

Vishal Vs State of Haryana and Others