The appellant, a husband, sought to withdraw his appeal against a matrimonial judgment, stating that he and the respondent-wife are residing happily. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-1848-2019 (O&M) Date of decision:- 15.09.2022
Rajesh Kumar Gupta
....Appellant
vs.
Chetna Rani Gupta & ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, for respondent No. 1.
Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant states that the appellant and respondent No. 1 are residing happily as husband and wife. Learned counsel wishes to withdraw the present appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
15.09.2022 (NIDHI GUPTA) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
GAURAV ARORA 2022.09.19 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Rajesh Kumar Gupta
Chetna Rani Gupta
Ritu Bahri
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
