Petition dismissed as infructuous because an FIR was registered, investigation completed, charges framed, and case challenged during pendency.
Petition dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-5601-2020 Date of decision : 02.09.2022
Malkeet Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Kanica Sachdeva, AAG, Punjab.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Ld. State Counsel submits that during the pendency of the present petition, FIR was registered. Investigation is complete. The Challan stands presented and even the charges have been framed.
Mr. Balbir K. Saini, Advocate appears on behalf of respondent No.7 and files his Power of Attorney, today in Court. The same is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by State Counsel, counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and he does not wish to pursue the same.
Resultantly, petition stands dismissed as having been rendered
infructuous.
| September 02, 2022 |
(PANKAJ JAIN) |
|---|---|
| Dpr | JUDGE |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.09.02 09:41 I attest to the accuracy of this document
Malkeet Singh
State of Punjab and others
PANKAJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
