Petitioner's counsel informed the court that parties have reconciled differences and instructed not to press the petition. The court dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
224
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-16489-2019 Date of decision : 02.09.2022
Chamandeep Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Nitin Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Madhur Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Somnath Tayel, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Sobti, Advocate for respondent No.2
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the
filing of the present petition, the parties have reconciled their differences and he has instructions not to press the present petition.
Resultantly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed.
| September 02, 2022 |
(PANKAJ JAIN) |
|---|---|
| Dpr | JUDGE |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.09.02 09:41 I attest to the accuracy of this document
Chamandeep Kaur
State of Punjab
Unknown Person
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
