Petitioner sought protection under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after her brother was allegedly killed in a fake encounter. Court noted security had already been provided. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-28296-2017 Date of decision : 01.09.2022
Sudesh Kataria
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Ambavta, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner is seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect her and her family members' life and liberty at the hands of respondents No.5 to 7.
“Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the brother of the petitioner was killed allegedly in a fake encounter in Mumbai. The police is pursuing the case. She seeks protection to her and her family members from respondent Nos.5 to 7.
Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 4 only.
Mr. R.K. Makkad, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on
behalf of the State-respondent Nos.1 to 4.
List on 20.09.2017.
In the meanwhile, the State is also directed to protect
DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.09.01 21:38 I attest to the accuracy of this document
the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members.
CRM-M-28296-2017 -2-
Reply on behalf of the State be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the counsel opposite.
petitioner has been provided security.
| September | 01, 2022 |
(PANKAJ JAIN) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dpr | JUDGE | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.09.01 21:38 I attest to the accuracy of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition filed for protection under Section 482 Cr.P.C. remains maintainable given that security had already been provided to the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudesh Kataria
State of Haryana
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
