The single-judge bench ordered the respondent to pass a speaking order within two months, stating reasons for the non-promotion of the petitioner despite her clearing the test earlier than her junior.
Pass fresh speaking order giving reasons for rejection within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
122
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP NO. 24944 OF 2021 DATE OF DECISION: 16.12.2021
Veena Rani …Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana.
(Presence marked through video conferencing).
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petitioner herein, inter alia , seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to promote the petitioner as Stenographer from the date she cleared her shorthand test, as her juniors were immediately promoted, whereas the petitioner was promoted after 11 months of her passing the test.
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.12.18 04:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
that fresh orders will be passed giving proper reasons thereof.
DECEMBER 16, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.12.18 04:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should issue a speaking order giving reasons for rejecting the petitioner's promotion claim.
Veena Rani
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
