Dismissed
Harwinder Kaur and Others v. State of Punjab and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/50474/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2021 ...1... IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2021 ...1... IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M No.50474 of 2021
...1...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.112
CRM-M No.50474 of 2021 Date of Decision: 13th December, 2021.
Harwinder Kaur & Others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab & Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, Advocate, for the petitioners.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that as regards the relief sought by the petitioners qua the issuance of the direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to conduct the investigation in respect of their representation Annexure P-3 and to register the FIR against respondents No.4 to 14, they (petitioners) would be availing the alternative, appropriate and efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to them under law, for this purpose and so far as their prayer for the protection of their lives and liberty is concerned, they would be moving a fresh representation to respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, exclusively praying therein for the said protection only and he further prays that respondent No.2 be directed to look into and take appropriate action on the fresh representation of the petitioners within some specific time frame.
SEEMA SHARMA 2021.12.14 10:15 I attest to the accuracy of this order
CRM-M No.50474 of 2021
...2...
Mr. B.S.Sewak, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, who has appeared on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the instant petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, submits that he has no objection to the abovediscussed submission as well as the prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn with a direction to respondent No.2 that in case, the petitioners move any fresh representation to him restricting their prayer therein to the protection of their lives and liberty only, he shall look into the same and if the petitioners would be found to be genuinely deserving the said protection, then he shall take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, in the given set of the facts and circumstances of the matter, preferably, within a period of two weeks.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE
13.12.2021.
seema
| Whether speaking/reasoned? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable? | No |
SEEMA SHARMA 2021.12.14 10:15 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Harwinder Kaur
State of Punjab
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court