The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn on the counsel’s submission that it had become infructuous, with no objection from the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.118
CRM-M No.24520 of 2021 Date of Decision: 13th December, 2021.
Om Parkash
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Vishal Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.1-State.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
the instant petition while submitting that this petition has become infructuous.
Learned State counsel has no objection to the same.
Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed as withdrawn
for having been rendered infructuous.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE
13.12.2021.
seema
| Whether speaking/reasoned? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable? | No |
SEEMA SHARMA 2021.12.13 17:53 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Om Parkash
State of Haryana
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
