Allowed

Harjinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Dec 2021CRM-M/27902/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners invoked Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash an FIR alleging injuries under IPC 323, 324, and 201. Upon verifying a verified compromise between parties, the single-judge bench quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings as futile under Gian Singh.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No.2 dated 07.01.2019 registered at PS Goindwal Sahib and all subsequent proceedings.

Harjinder Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Sr.No.269

¶3

CRM-M No.27902 of 2021 Date of Decision: 13.12.2021

¶4

Harjinder Singh and others

¶5

...Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Punjab and another ...Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

¶9

Present: Mr. Jagdish Singh Mahal, Advocate, for the petitioners (joined through virtual mode).

¶10

Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1-State.

¶11

Mr. Paras Jagga, Advocate for respondent No.2 (joined through virtual mode).

¶12

¶13

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

¶14

By way of the instant petition, the petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C for seeking the quashing of the FIR bearing No.2 dated 07.01.2019 registered at Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, under Sections 323, 324 read with Section 34 IPC (wherein the offence under Section 201 IPC is stated to have been added later-on) as well as the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, while averring that the parties have arrived at a compromise qua their dispute, culminating in the registration of the said FIR.

¶15

Shorn and short of unnecessary details, the allegations, as levelled in the subject FIR, are that the petitioners caused injuries to

¶16

NEETU RANI 2021.12.14 18:05 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

¶17

CRM-M No.27902 of 2021 -2-

¶18

......

¶19

respondent No.2-complainant with Kirpan , baseball bat etc.

¶20

Vide the order dated 20.07.2021 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench, the private parties had been directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 30.07.2021 for recording their statements in respect of the compromise. In compliance of the said order, learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Khadur Sahib, recorded their (parties') statements and has submitted the report (which is already available on the file) mentioning therein that the compromise effected between the parties is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence and four (04) persons, i.e. the petitioners, have been arraigned as accused in the subject FIR and none of them has been declared a proclaimed offender nor any other FIR has been registered against them. The statements of both the parties as well as of the investigating officer named Nirmal Singh ASI have also been annexed with the said report.

¶21

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondent No.2 in the present petition and have also perused the file thoroughly.

¶22

The said compromise has been effected to put the dispute between the parties at rest for all the times to come and the same would promote peaceful, harmonious and cordial relations between them. It being so, there are bleak chances of the conviction of the petitioners and in these circumstances, the continuation of the proceedings in the case arising out of the said FIR would be an exercise in futility.

¶23

Keeping in view the above-discussed facts and circumstances

¶24

NEETU RANI 2021.12.14 18:05 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

¶25

CRM-M No.27902 of 2021

¶26

-3-

¶27

......

¶28

as well as the observations as made by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another (2012) 4 RCR (Criminal) 543 , the FIR bearing No.2 dated 07.01.2019 registered at Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, under Sections 323, 324 read with Section 34 IPC (wherein the offence under Section 201 IPC is stated to have been added later-on), as well as the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom (if any), are hereby quashed.

¶29

The petition in hand stands allowed accordingly.

¶30

13.12.2021		(MEENA
neetu
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes
	Whether Reportable	No

¶31

NEETU RANI 2021.12.14 18:05 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

Harjinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harjinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailash Aggarwal Vs State of Punjab

Manoj Kumar Vs State of Haryana

Balkar Singh Vs State of Punjab

Sandeep Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Om Parkash Vs State of Haryana and Another

Naresh Kumar @ Pandit Vs State of Punjab and Anr.