Dismissed
Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/49801/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.111
CRM-M No.49801 of 2021 Date of Decision: 13th December, 2021.
Surjit Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that the petitioner would be availing the alternative appropriate and efficacious remedy to seek the redressal of his grievance, as canvassed in this petition.
Mr. B.S.Sewak, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, who has appeared on behalf of all the respondents in this case in pursuance of the copies of the instant petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, has no objection for the withdrawal of the present petition.
Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn accordingly.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE
13.12.2021.
seema
| Whether speaking/reasoned? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable? | No |
SEEMA SHARMA 2021.12.13 17:53 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Surjit Singh
State of Punjab
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court