The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition during the hearing upon the Court expressing disinclination to interfere. The petition was dismissed on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-1686 OF 2021
DATE OF DECISION : 05.04.2021
Roop Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Talwar, DAG, Haryana.
(Presence marked through video conference).
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
After arguments were addressed for some time, when this Court
showed its disinclination to interfere, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the petition,at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
APRIL 05, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) shalini JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.04.06 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Roop Singh
State of Haryana
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
