Petitioner's writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the challengeable advertisement was withdrawn and replaced with a fresh one.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
128
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-6957-2021 Date of Decision: 01.04.2021 Suman Kumari ...Petitioner
V/S
State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, For the petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Talwar, DAG, Haryana. (Presence marked through video conference)
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the instant petition is rendered infructuous, as the advertisement in question has been withdrawn vide Cancellation Notice dated 10.02.2021 by the competent authority. In lieu thereof, a fresh advertisement No.1/2021 has been published.
In view of the aforesaid statement, writ petition is disposed of
as infructuous.
April 01, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.04.05 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Suman Kumari
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
