Sumit Mann v. Anil
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the matter as non-prosecution since the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls on 10.12.2021.
What the court decided
Sr. No.202 3rd case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1179-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.12.2021
Sumit Mann …Petitioner
Vs.
Anil …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent. (Presence marked through video conference)
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Despite several calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of
the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sumit Mann
- respondent
Anil
Coram
Arun Monga
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/1179/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court