The petition presented no appearance despite calls. No substantive legal issue or reasoning was considered. The matter was dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.202
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1150-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.12.2021
Sumit Mann …Petitioner
Vs.
Ajay …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent. (Presence marked through video conference)
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Despite several calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of
the petitioner.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
10.12.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.12.13 02:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sumit Mann
Ajay
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
