Dismissed
Samrath Singh v. State Bank of India and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/6693/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
CWP withdrawal allowed; no substantive decision.
What the court decided
AI extract
CWP withdrawal allowed; no substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.6693 of 2020 Date of Decision: 13.03.2020
Samrath Singh
......Petitioner
Versus
State Bank of India and Ors.
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Ms. Anishka Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJIV SHARMA,J
After arguing the matter for some time and having failed to convince the Court, learned counsel craves for leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJIV SHARMA)
JUDGE
(HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE
March 13, 2020 manoj
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2020.03.13 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Samrath Singh
State Bank of India
Rajiv Sharma
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court