A writ petition was filed seeking issuance of a mandamus directing respondents to provide passage to a plot and restrain disposal of property. The trial court had already determined rights between parties. The High Court dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.
Writ petition dismissed as devoid of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.6495 of 2020 Date of Decision: 12.03.2020
Manju Gupta
......Petitioner
Versus
Sanjay Gupta and Anr.
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHARMA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Shivam Grover, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJIV SHARMA,J
By way of instituting this petition, the petitioner has sought for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide passage to the plot No.B-XX-78 in which he is residing through Plot No.BXX-77/445 apart from restraining the respondents from disposing of the property situated at Plot No.B-XX-77/445.
It is discernible from the perusal of paper book that the rights of the petitioner qua path have already been determined by the trial Court in Civil Suit No.4574 of 2018 filed by the petitioner vide order dated 03.09.2019 (P.2). In case, the petitioner is aggrieved, she can file execution petition.
The writ petition is ordered to be dismissed being devoid of
merit.
(RAJIV SHARMA) JUDGE
(HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE
March 12, 2020 manoj
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2020.03.16 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
MANOJ KUMAR 2020.03.16 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Manju Gupta
Sanjay Gupta
RAJIV SHARMA
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
