of 2016 & -1- COCP No. 3180 of 2016 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 664 of 2016 & COCP No. 3180 of 2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 664 of 2016 Date of Decision: 25th August, 2020
Vishal Gupta and another
....Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents
COCP No. 3180 of 2016
Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited.
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Vishal Gupta and another
....Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: None for the Petitioners in CWP-664-2020.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the Petitioner in COCP-3180-2016.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.
CWP No. 664 of 2016
JITENDER KUMAR 2020.08.26 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP No. 664 of 2016 & -2COCP No. 3180 of 2016
COCP No. 3180 of 2016
(S. MURALIDHAR) JUDGE
(AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE
25th August, 2020 jk
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JITENDER KUMAR 2020.08.26 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
Vishal Gupta
State of Haryana
S. Muralidhar
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
