The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a contempt petition as compurgatory, because the underlying civil writ petition (CWP No. 3996 of 2017) had already been dismissed. The matter was disposed of without a separate hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP-2309-2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2309-2016 Date of Decision: 24th August, 2020
Ganga Mandir
.......Petitioner
Versus
Vikas Gupta and another
......Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.
Since CWP No. 3996 of 2017, from which the instant contempt petition arises itself has been dismissed, the contempt petition is also disposed of.
(S. MURALIDHAR) JUDGE
(AVNEESH JHINGAN) 24th August, 2020 JUDGE shabha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
JITENDER KUMAR 2020.08.26 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Ganga Mandir
Vikas Gupta
another
S.Muralidhar
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
