This judgment dismissed a writ petition and a subsequent contempt petition because the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and others (AIR 2020 SC 1496) resolved the surviving legal issue, leaving no dispute.
Writ petition and contempt petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-13486-2016 & COCP-1399-2018
-1-
209/90
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 13486 of 2016 (O&M) & COCP No. 1399 of 2018
Date of Decision: 24th August, 2020
Joginder Singh and others
.......Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.
CWP-13486-2016 (O&M)
Development Authority v. Manoharlal and others etc. , AIR 2020 SC 1496 .
JITENDER KUMAR 2020.08.26 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-13486-2016 & COCP-1399-2018
-2-
COCP-1399-2018
(S. MURALIDHAR) JUDGE
(AVNEESH JHINGAN) 24th August, 2020 JUDGE shabha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
JITENDER KUMAR 2020.08.26 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and others etc.Referred¶18
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and others etc., AIR 2020 SC 1496 · Who else cites this
Joginder Singh and others
State of Haryana and others
S. Muralidhar
Avneesh Jhingana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
