The High Court at Chandigarh, forming a single judge bench, dismissed a writ petition challenging the petitioner's ineligibility to be declared as successful in a PGT (Commerce) selection process due to insufficient marks.
The writ petition is dismissed as the petitioner did not achieve the required cut-off marks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.439 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.16.09.2019
Jyoti Anand
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Result brought by learned State counsel in sealed cover has been opened. Cut off marks for PGT (Commerce) under General Category is 116 marks whereas the petitioner obtained 94 marks in written examination and 19 marks in viva voce , in total 113 marks. Petitioner has not been able to make cut off marks.
Writ petition stands dismissed. Result is given back to
counsel appearing for the State.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 16, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.09.20 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the ineligibility for advertisement cut-off marks should be allowed.
Jyoti Anand
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
