Justice Amit Rawal dismissed a writ petition where the petitioner contested a selection process. The court held that the petitioner obtained 114 marks against a cut-off of 150, failing to meet the zone of consideration, thus no cause of action survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.16 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CWP-4449-2019 (O&M)
117
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-4449-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.09.2019
Parveen Kumar
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Doon, AAG, Haryana.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the State has produced detailed Marks obtained by the petitioner, in sealed cover. The same has been opened, perused and on comparison with cut off 150, the petitioner has obtained 114 marks, therefore, has not been able to come within the zone of consideration.
In such circumstances, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed.
( AMIT RAWAL ) 12.09.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's eligibility for selection was correctly denied based on inspection marks not meeting the cut-off.
Parveen Kumar
State of Haryana
Another
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
