The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, holding that the petitioner's grievance had been vindicated and no cause of action survived.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.16 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CWP-12628-2019 (O&M)
311
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12628-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.09.2019
Kawaljeet Kaur
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives in present writ petition as grievance of petitioner has been vindicated, thus, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
( AMIT RAWAL ) 12.09.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Kawaljeet Kaur
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
