In this oral judgment, the Court dismissed the present writ petition as it was squarely covered by the earlier judgment in CWP No.17118 of 2019 titled Neha Chandel vs. Haryana Public Service Commission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.16743 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision:10.09.2019
Jai Kishan and others
... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Haryana ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. H.N.Mehtani, Advocate with Mr.Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for the respondent-HPSC.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent-HPSC informed the Court that matter is squarely covered by judgment dated 13.08.2019 passed in CWP No.17118 of 2019 titled as 'Neha Chandel Vs. Haryana Public Service Commission'.
This fact has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners.
In view of aforementioned, present writ petition is dismissed in terms of judgment dated 13.08.2019 passed in CWP No.17118 of 2019 titled as Neha Chandel Vs. Haryana Public Service Commission'.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 10, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.09.11 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Neha Chandel Vs. Haryana Public Service CommissionFollowed¶11
CWP No.17118 of 2019
Jai Kishan and others
State of Haryana
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
