Disposed

Roshni Devi and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Sept 2019CWP/15876/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana, on an oral application, disposed of a writ petition as a compromise. The court directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioners' representation within two months, failing which costs of Rs.25,000 would be imposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide representation within two months with a penalty of Rs.25,000 if delayed.

Roshni Devi and Others Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP No.15876 of 2019

¶2

{1}

¶3

Sr. No.130

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CWP No.15876 of 2019 Date of decision:09.09.2019

¶6

Roshni Devi and others

¶7

... Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

State of Haryana and others

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶12

Present:Mr. Neeraj Goel, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶13

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)

¶14

Prayer in present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to grant the pay scale of Rs.1400-2600 to the petitioners w.e.f. 01.01.1986 alongwith all consequential benefits instead of granting it w.e.f. 01.05.1990.

¶15

Notice of motion.

¶16

On asking of Court, Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents/State.

¶17

Mr. Neeraj Goel, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that petitioners, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide representation (Annexure P-6) within some specified time.

¶18

SAVITA KADIAN 2019.09.12 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶19

CWP No.15876 of 2019 {2}

¶20

In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into merit of case or commenting thereon, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation (Annexure P-6) by passing a well reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶21

In case, representation is not decided within aforementioned specified time, there shall be costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid by the concerned officer to the petitioners.

¶22

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 09, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶23

SAVITA KADIAN 2019.09.12 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Roshni Devi and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roshni Devi and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parvesh Kaushish and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Jagdish Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Rampal Vs State of Haryana and Others

Naveen Kumar and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Anuradha Vs State of Haryana and Others

Kirti Vs Haryana School Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad and Another