The Writ Petition was dismissed as having become infructuous because the result had already been declared, leaving nothing for consideration by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7627 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.09.09.2019
Kavita Bishnoi ...Petitioner Vs State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
Present: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that result of petitioner
has been declared and therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the instant writ petition.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 09, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.09.11 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kavita Bishnoi
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
