The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. An order dated 21.02.2019 granting bail to the petitioner was made absolute.
The interim order dated 21.02.2019 granting anticipatory bail was made absolute and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-7124-2019 DATE OF DECISION:-10.04.2019
JEON SINGH @ JEONA
...PETITIONER...
V.
STATE OF PUNJAB
...RESPONDENT...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No.206 dated 08.11.2018, under Sections 323, 451, 440, 506, 148, 149 IPC (Sections 458, 308 IPC added later on), Police Station Sadar Patiala, District Patiala.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Davinder Singh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 21.02.2019 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
10.04.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: whether reportable:
Yes/No Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.04.10 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Consideration of prima facie balance of convenience in granting anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JEON SINGH @ JEONA
STATE OF PUNJAB
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
