The High Court dismissed the instant application as withdrawn upon the counsel's prayer that the matter had been settled between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A-4-MA-2016 DECIDED ON: 09.04.2019
RAJIV MALHOTRA AND ANR.
...APPLICANTS..
VERSUS
SUMMIT GOYAL
...RESPONDENT..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Rishan Jain, Advocate, for the applicants.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the applicants prays for withdrawal of
instant application as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
09.04.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.04.09 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
RAJIV MALHOTRA AND ANR.
SUMMIT GOYAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
