Petitioner filed a writ petition which was declared infructuous as he was declared innocent by the investigating officer; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4272-2019 DATE OF DECISION:-23.05.2019
SANDEEP SHARMA
...PETITIONER..
V.
STATE OF PUNJAB
...RESPONDENT...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Karanjeet Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hittan Nehra, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel contends that instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that petitioner has been declared innocent by the investigating officer.
In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
23.05.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.05.23 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
SANDEEP SHARMA
STATE OF PUNJAB
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
