Single-judge order granting anticipatory bail application. Court noted petitioners had joined investigation and no further interrogation was required, and made the previous order absolute.
Previous order dated 20.02.2019 granting anticipatory bail made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-1887-2019 DATE OF DECISION:-23.05.2019
RAJWINDER SINGH AND ANR.
...PETITIONERS...
V.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Hittan Nehra, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, in case, FIR No.77 dated 22.12.2018, registered under Sections 452, 326, 324, 323, 148 and 149 IPC, Police Station Ghuman Kalan, District Gurdaspur.
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for further interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 20.02.2019 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
23.05.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.05.23 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAJWINDER SINGH AND ANR.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
