Bench not inclined to grant regular bail; petitioners' counsel sought withdrawal. Court granted leave to withdraw the petition.
Petitioners permitted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-1836-2019
Date of Decision: 23.05.2019
Laxman and another
.... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Dr. AK Bishnoi, Advocate for the complainant.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners, leaned counsel submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
Ordered accordingly.
May 23, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2019.05.24 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Laxman
The State of Haryana
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
