Allowed

Gurpreet Singh @ Gullu and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Apr 2019CRM-M/4910/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the prayer to quash FIR No.111 registered for IPC and Arms Act offenses. Relying on the Judicial Magistrate's report of a genuine compromise and the absence of proclaimed offenders, the Court quashed proceedings qua the petitioners to restore peace.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.111 dated 19.05.2018 and all subsequent proceedings are quashed qua the petitioners only.

Gurpreet Singh @ Gullu and Anr. Vs State… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CRM-M-4910 of 2019

¶2

--1--

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-4910 of 2019 DATE OF DECISION:-08.04.2019

¶5

GURPREET SINGH @ GULLU AND ORS.

¶6

...PETITIONERS...

¶7

¶8

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

¶9

...RESPONDENTS...

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶11

Present: Mr. APS Mann, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶12

Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

¶13

¶14

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been made for quashing FIR No.111 dated 19.05.2018, registered under Sections 323, 324, 336, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short, "Act") (Section 336 IPC and Sections 25/27 of Act deleted and Sections 325, 326 IPC added subsequently) at Police Station Tanda, Hoshiarpur (P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (P-3).

¶16

Pursuant to order dated 04.02.2019 of this Court, the parties appeared before the trial Court on 15.03.2019 along with receipt of `15,000/- to get their statements recorded. Learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Dasuya, has submitted her report vide letter bearing No.215 dated 03.04.2019 duly forwarded by learned District and Sessions Judge, SONIKA 2019.04.09 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this documentHoshiarpur, vide Endst. No.9993 dated 03.04.2019. Chandigarh

¶17

CRM-M-4910 of 2019

¶18

--2--

¶19

According to the report, ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Dasuya, is satisfied that a genuine compromise has been effected between the petitioners and respondents No.2 and 3. No accused has been declared as proclaimed offender.

¶20

Considering the report of ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Dasuya, dated 03.04.2019 and the fact that the compromise will bring peace and harmony in relations between the parties, aforesaid FIR No.111 dated 19.05.2018 along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua the petitioners only.

¶21

Disposed of accordingly.

¶22

08.04.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No

¶23

SONIKA 2019.04.09 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Gurpreet Singh @ Gullu and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurpreet Singh @ Gullu and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurdial Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Pawandeep Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Baljit Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Sucha Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Madan Kumar Vs State of U.T. Chandigarh and Another

Gurjeet Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.