Remanded

Sucha Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Apr 2019CRM-M/4949/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge oral order, pursuant to a report from the trial court, quashed a cross-version case registered under Sections 325 and 326 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act on the basis of a compromise effected between the petitioners and respondents.

What did the court decide?

DDR No.23 dated 20.05.2018 in FIR No.111 along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom is quashed qua the petitioners only.

Sucha Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CRM-M-4949 of 2019

¶2

--1--

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-4949 of 2019 DATE OF DECISION:-08.04.2019

¶5

SUCHA SINGH AND ORS.

¶6

...PETITIONERS...

¶7

¶8

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

¶9

...RESPONDENTS...

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶11

Present: Mr. Gaurav Gurcharan Singh Rai, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶12

Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

¶13

¶14

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been made for quashing cross-version case bearing DDR No.23 dated 20.05.2018 (P-2) in FIR No.111 dated 19.05.2018, registered under Sections 323, 324, 336, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short, "Act") (Section 336 IPC and Sections 25/27 of Act deleted and Sections 325, 326 IPC added subsequently) at Police Station Tanda, Hoshiarpur and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (P-3).

¶16

Pursuant to order dated 04.02.2019 of this Court, the parties appeared before the trial Court on 15.03.2019 along with receipt of `15,000/- to get their statements recorded. Learned Judicial Magistrate Ist

¶17

Class, Dasuya, has submitted her report vide letter bearing No.214 dated SONIKA 2019.04.09 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document03.04.2019 duly forwarded by learned District and Sessions Judge, Chandigarh

¶18

CRM-M-4949 of 2019

¶19

--2--

¶20

Hoshiarpur, vide Endst. No.9992 dated 03.04.2019.

¶21

According to the report, ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Dasuya, is satisfied that a genuine compromise has been effected between the petitioners and respondents No.2 and 3. No accused has been declared as proclaimed offender.

¶22

Considering the report of ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Dasuya, dated 03.04.2019 and the fact that the compromise will bring peace and harmony in relations between the parties, aforesaid DDR No.23 dated 20.05.2018 (P-2) in FIR No.111 dated 19.05.2018 along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua the petitioners only.

¶23

Disposed of accordingly.

¶24

08.04.2019 sonika		(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: whether reportable:	Yes/No Yes/No

¶25

SONIKA 2019.04.09 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Sucha Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sucha Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurdial Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Pawandeep Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Baljit Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Gurpreet Singh @ Gullu and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Madan Kumar Vs State of U.T. Chandigarh and Another

Gurjeet Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.