Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the revision petition, which was allowed by the single judge.
Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw the revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.02.07 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1
CR-4643-2018 (O&M)
201
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-4643-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.02.2019
Lajpat Rai
... Petitioner
Versus
Santosh Rani and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. S.M. Wadehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the present revision petition. Ordered accordingly.
04.02.2019 ( AMIT RAWAL ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Yogesh Sharma
Santosh Rani
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
