Disposed

Ranbir Singh v. Navdeep Kaur

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Feb 2019CR/4050/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two revision petitions filed by the petitioner-husband regarding child custody. The Court observed that the main petition was not filed, and the application made was merely procedural. Consequently, the revision petitions were withdrawn with liberty to file the appropriate remedy.

What did the court decide?

The revision petitions were disposed of by holding them not maintainable without a main application, with liberty to withdraw and file appropriate remedy.

Ranbir Singh Vs Navdeep Kaur — Child Custody and Guardianship | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.02.07 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR Nos.4050 & 9544 of 2018 (O&M) 1

¶2

215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG	JAB AND HARYANA ARH
	Date of decision : 01.02.2019
1.	CR-4050-2018 (O&M)
Ranbir Singh Versus	... Petitioner
Navdeep Kaur	... Respondent
2.	CR-9544-2018 (O&M)
Ranbir Singh Versus	... Petitioner
Navdeep Kaur	... Respondent

¶3

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶4

Present: Mr. B.S. Guliani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Dhandi, Advocate for the respondent. ****

¶5

AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)

¶6

This order of mine shall dispose of two revision petition, aforementioned, filed at the instance of the petitioner-husband, against the impugned orders dated 04.10.2018 and 01.06.2018.

¶7

The proceedings for custody of the child had already been settled, at that stage, as the child was less than 5 years. After attaining the age of five years, without moving appropriate petition, only an application

¶8

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.02.07 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2

¶9

CR Nos.4050 & 9544 of 2018 (O&M)

¶10

was filed, which has been rejected by the trial Court, by giving certain relief for the time being.

¶11

This Court confronted Mr. Guliani, as to whether any fresh application along with interim application has been filed. The answer is 'No'. In my view, custody of the child, in the absence of any original application and interim application, cannot be entertained, in the present case.

¶12

Faced with the above said situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this to withdraw the revision petitions with liberty to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law.

¶13

Ordered accordingly.

¶14

In case the main petition is filed, any order passed in the application, will not come in the way of the petitioner, in seeking interim custody or stay.

¶15

01.02.2019 ( AMIT RAWAL ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE  Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No  Whether Reportable Yes/ No

¶16

Yogesh Sharma

Ranbir Singh v. Navdeep Kaur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranbir Singh v. Navdeep Kaur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charanjeet Singh and Ors. Vs Gurdarshan Singh and Ors.

Didar Singh Vs Principal, Sri Guru Gobind Singh College and Ors.

Gurdev Singh & Ors. Vs Joginder Singh Deceased through Lrs Mewa Singh and Anr.

Municipal Corporation Kotfatta and Anr. Vs Gaura Devi and Ors.

Ranbir Singh Vs Navdeep Kaur

Mohit and Ors. Vs Rishpal Singh and Ors.