The appeal was disposed of in terms of orders passed in a related RSA. The judgment contains no substantive reasoning or operative order details in the provided text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2018.05.11 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.559 of 1991
Baksha Singh (Deceased through LRs)
....Appellant
Versus
Kabul Singh (dead) through LRs etc
....Respondents
Date of Order: 02.5.2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. G.S Nagra, Advocate for the respondents.
AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL)
Disposed of in terms of orders passed in RSA No.558 of 1991.
| May 02, 2018 | `(AMIT RAWAL) | |
|---|---|---|
| manoj | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned: | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable |
: Yes/No |
Baksha Singh (Deceased through LRs)
Kabul Singh (dead) through LRs etc
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
