Balwant Singh v. Ujjagar Singh & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court considered two review applications. The first, regarding a 61-day delay, was allowed. The second, seeking condonation of 352 days delay and re-agarding merits, was dismissed as not permissible under established precedents on review. The order is mostly a condonation order which allows the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 61 days condoned and application allowed in CM-4832-C; Application for delay condonation and review dismissed in CM-4833-C.
What the court decided
Manoj Kumar 2018.05.07 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document #1#
RA No.31-C of 2018 (O&M) in R.A.No.144-C of 2016 in RSA No.2978 of 1987
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA No.31-C of 2018 (O&M) in R.A.No.144-C of 2016 in RSA No.2978 of 1987
Balwant Singh
....Appellant
Versus
Ujjagar Singh and Ors.
....Respondents
Date of Order: 02.5.2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr. S.S. Swaich, Advocate for the applicant/respondent No.9. AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL)
CM-4832-C of 2018
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a review application reiterating old arguments negates the earlier refusal of relief and warrants a rehearing.
Whether the delay in filing the review application is condonable in view of the grounds being identical to the original appeal.
Whether error appears on the face of the record to exercise the power of review.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Balwant Singh
- respondent
Ujjagar Singh and Ors.
Coram
Amit Rawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RA-RS/31/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court