Wasawa Singh v. Surinder Kumar Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2018.05.04 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
C.R.No.5062 of 2017
Wasawa Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Surinder Kumar Sharma
....Respondent
Date of Order: 02.5.2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohinder Pal, Advocate for the respondent.
AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
present revision has become infructuous in terms of decision passed in RSA No.4703 of 2017.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
| May 02, 2018 | `(AMIT RAWAL) | |
|---|---|---|
| manoj | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned: | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable |
: Yes/No |
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
RSA No.4703 of 2017Followed¶14
Wasawa Singh
Surinder Kumar Sharma
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court