Sanju v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition as rendered infructuous because the petitioner had been convicted by the trial court. No reasons were recorded.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition as rendered infructuous because the petitioner had been convicted by the trial court. No reasons were recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-34951 of 2017
Date of decision : 05.02.2018
Sanju
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Haryana
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Chetan Sharma, AAG Haryana.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned State counsel submits that present petition has been rendered infructuous as petitioner has been convicted by the trial court.
In view of statement made by him, this petition is dismissed as
having been rendered infructuous.
February 05, 2018 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2018.02.07 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Sanju
State of Haryana
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court