Disposed
Parshant Sharma v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/20557/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-20557 of 2016
Date of decision : 02.02.2018
Parshant Sharma
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Punjab
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. S. S. Narula, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. A.A. Pathak, Additional A.G. Punjab.
Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the complainant.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
For orders see CRM M-4558 of 2016 titled as Radhey Sham vs.
State of Punjab of even date.
February 02, 2018 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2018.02.07 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Radhey Sham vs. State of PunjabFollowed¶14
CRM M-4558 of 2016 titled as Radhey Sham vs. State of Punjab of even date
Parshant Sharma
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court