Disposed

Ranjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Jan 2018CRM-M/3355/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition seeking direction to authorities to decide a representation for fair investigation in an IPC 376 case, filed a representation on 10.01.2018, which the Court made a notice, and directed the respondent to decide the representation within four weeks without going into merits.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondent No. 2 to decide representation dated 10.01.2018 within four weeks and take necessary action in accordance with law.

Ranjit Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Punjab & Haryana HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-3355-2018 Date of decision: 25.01.2018

Ranjit Kaur

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶7

...Respondents

¶8

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

¶10

Present: Mr. A.S. Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶11

¶12

JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)

¶13

The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to official respondent Nos. 2 & 3 for fair investigation in case FIR No. 251 dated 08.12.2017 under Section 376 IPC, registered at Police Station, Canal Colony Bathinda, District Bathinda. In this regard the petitioner has also approached the authorities by filing representation dated 10.01.2018 (Annexure P-2).

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 be directed to look into the representation dated dated 10.01.2018 (Annexure P-2) and take action in accordance with law, in a time bound manner.

¶15

Notice of motion.

¶16

On asking of the Court Mrs. Anju Arora, learned Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶17

Satyawan 2018.01.25 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶18

CRM-M-3355-2018

¶19

-2-

¶20

Three copies of the petition be handed over to him by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day failing which no action is called for. She submits that representation dated 10.01.2018 (Annexure P-2) will be decided within a period of four weeks.

¶21

Heard.

¶22

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide representation dated 10.01.2018 (Annexure P-2), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law.

¶23

25.01.2018

¶24

Satyawan

¶25

(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE

¶26

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes. Whether reportable No.

¶27

Satyawan 2018.01.25 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Ranjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Vs State of Haryana

Praveen Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Bijender Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Rameshwari Devi @ Ishro Devi Vs State of Haryana

Astuna Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Lakhan Vs State of Haryana