Disposed

Praveen v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC24 Jan 2018CRM-M/2895/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Upon filing an oral petition seeking directions to state authorities to act on a representation concerning an FIR, the High Court, without examining merits, directed the respondent to decide the representation within four weeks and take necessary legal action.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 29.11.2017 within four weeks and take necessary action in accordance with law.

Praveen Vs State of Haryana & Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-2895-2018 Date of decision: 24.01.2018

Praveen

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶7

...Respondents

¶8

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

¶10

Present: Dr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶11

¶12

JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)

¶13

The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to the respondents to take action against the accused persons in case FIR No. 106 dated 25.10.2017 under Sections 342, 506, 120-B IPC and Sections 6 & 17 of POCSO Act, registered at Women Police Station, Karnal. In this regard the petitioner has also approached the authorities by filing representation dated 29.11.2017 (Annexure P-2).

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 be directed to look into the representation dated dated 29.11.2017 (Annexure P-2) and take action in accordance with law, in a time bound manner.

¶15

Notice of motion.

¶16

Satyawan 2018.01.25 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶17

CRM-M-2895-2018

¶18

-2-

¶19

Mr.P.P. Chahar, learned DAG, Haryana who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Three copies of the petition be handed over to him by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day failing which no action is called for. He submits that representation dated 29.11.2017 (Annexure P-2) will be decided within a period of four weeks.

¶20

Heard.

¶21

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide representation dated 29.11.2017 (Annexure P-2), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law.

¶22

24.01.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE

¶23

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes. Whether reportable No.

¶24

Satyawan 2018.01.25 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Praveen v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praveen v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravinder Singh and Another Vs State of Punjab

Madhu Vs State of Haryana & Others

Subhash Chander Goyal, IAS Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Anil Vs State of Haryana

Bijender Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Yogesh Vs State of Haryana