Hargurvir Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

It is contended that petitioner No.2 – Prerna Sharma, aged about 21 years has got married with petitioner No.1- Hargurvir Singh, aged about 25 years, against the wishes of her family members, arrayed as private respondents No. 4 and 5, who are threatening to interfere in their marital life, as such to seek protection in that regard, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition.

¶12

The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, to look into the grievances of the petitioners and to take necessary measures to ensure that lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at

¶13

Banita Chugh 2018.03.16 14:06 I am the author of this document

¶14

CRM-M No. 11026 of 2018 -2-

¶15

the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5 or persons claiming under them.

¶16

However, this order shall not validate the marriage between

¶17

the petitioners and shall not have any effect on any civil or criminal action to which the petitioners may be found liable, under the law.

¶18

( H.S. Madaan ) 16.3.2018 Judge

¶19

chugh

¶20

Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No

¶21

Whether reportable Yes / No

¶22

Banita Chugh 2018.03.16 14:06 I am the author of this document

Hargurvir Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hargurvir Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeewan Vs State of Haryana

Balwinder Singh and Ors. Vs Jaswant Singh

Angrej Singh Vs State of Hy.

Amanpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Baljinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Baldina and Another Vs the State of Punjab and Others