Randhir and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

The petitioners have approached this Court impugning acquisition of land invoking the provisions of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short 'the 2013 Act'). The plea raised was that the amount of compensation has not been paid to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State referred to the facts noticed in the impugned order by the authority wherein it has been specifically mentioned that on account of dispute regarding apportionment of compensation, the amount was deposited in Court on 28.06.2013 under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid facts, we do not find that any case for interference is made out under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

¶12

Writ petition is dismissed.

¶13

(Rajesh Bindal) Judge

¶14

(Ramendra Jain) May 23, 2017 Judge R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶15

Ravinder Singh 2017.05.26 08:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Randhir and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Randhir and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

M/S Afrik Farms Pvt. Vs State of Hry

Harbans Singh and Ors. Vs State of Pb. and Ors.

Prem Parkash Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Krishna Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Sadhu Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.