The petitioner did not appear before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without any substantive decision on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10674 of 1996 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.5.2017
Mohinder Kaur
.. Petitioner
versus
The State of Punjab and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. Amaninder Preet, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Modi, Advocate, for Improvement Trust.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
The case was shown in the taken up list number of times. Even
on 20.2.2017, none has appeared for the petitioner.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Bindal)
Judge
(Ramendra Jain)
Judge
22.5.2017 sharmila Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Mohinder Kaur
The State of Punjab
Rajesh Bindal
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
