The writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings was dismissed. The court held that the petitioner lacks title to the property, claims only tenancy, and the title suit is pending. No grievance regarding acquisition was found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11324 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.05.2017
Prem Parkash ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
The petitioner herein has no title to the property. He merely claims himself to be a tenant on the property for which dispute regarding apportionment of compensation raised by him is pending consideration before the Reference Court. Even his suit, filed about seven years after the acquisition claiming title on the property, is also pending. The land owner has no grievance to the acquisition of land.
Considering the aforesaid, we do not find that any case is made out for interference in the present petition. Same is dismissed.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
| (Ramendra Jain) | |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 | Judge |
| R.S. | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
Ravinder Singh 2017.05.26 08:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Prem Parkash
State of Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
