High Court at Chandigarh quashed an FIR registered for offences under IPC Sections 323, 324, 506 based on a recorded compromise between the accused and the victim, citing harmony in relations and voluntariness of the compromise.
FIR No. 0568 dated 03.08.2015 and all subsequent proceedings against the petitioner are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-27588-2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-27588-2016
Date of decision: 23.10.2017
Harish Kumar @ Hunny
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
CRM-M-27588-2016 -2-
vide letter No. 12403 dated 17.08.2017, has been received. According to
the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Karnal, the compromise between the parties is genuine one, because both the parties have assembled in the Court and have made statements voluntarily.
October 23, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2017.10.25 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR and subsequent proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on basis of compromise.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Harish Kumar @ Hunny
State of Haryana
Another
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
