Quashed

Kulwinder Singh Sidhu v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Oct 2017CRM-M/28842/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.65 registered under selected IPC sections. The court relied on a report from the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate confirming that the compromise between the parties was genuine, voluntary, and served to restore harmony.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.65 dated 11.03.2005 registered at Police Station City Batala under Sections 452, 382, 324, 323, 506 and 34 IPC is hereby quashed.

Kulwinder Singh Sidhu Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Dowry and Cruelty | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CRM-M-28842 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-28842 of 2017 Date of Decision: 13.10.2017

¶5

Kulwinder Singh Sidhu

¶6

....Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and another

¶9

....Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶11

Present: - Mr. G.S. Simble, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Tarun Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

¶12

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been made for quashing FIR No.65 dated 11.03.2005 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 452, 382, 324, 323, 506 and 34 IPC registered at Police Station City Batala, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).

¶14

Pursuant to the order dated 08.08.2017 of this Court, the parties appeared before the trial Court on 04.09.2017 to get their statements recorded. Learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Batala, has submitted his report vide letter bearing No.1083 dated 05.09.2017 duly forwarded by learned District and Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur vide letter No.15429/RKT dated 06.09.2017.

¶15

According to the report, the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate is satisfied that compromise entered into between the parties is genuine, voluntary, and out of their free will.

¶16

Ravinder Singh 2017.10.13 17:13 Considering the report of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶17

dated 05.09.2017 and the fact that the compromise will bring harmony in

¶18

-2-

¶19

CRM-M-28842 of 2017

¶20

relations between the parties, FIR No.65 dated 11.03.2005 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 452, 382, 324, 323, 506 and 34 IPC registered at Police Station City Batala, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur, is hereby quashed.

¶21

Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶22

October 13, 2017 R.S.

¶23

(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶25

Ravinder Singh 2017.10.13 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Kulwinder Singh Sidhu v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kulwinder Singh Sidhu v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vakil Singh Vs State of Haryana

Vijay @ Digvijay and Ors. Vs State of Haryana

Pardeep Vs State of Haryana

Jasvir Singh Vs State of Punjab

John Alias Joyn and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Mayank Kaura Vs Ut of Chandigarh and Another