Single judge quashed an FIR under Section 482 CrPC upon confirmation of a genuine compromise between the parties by the trial court.
FIR No. 260 dated 25.11.2015 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-11386-2017
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11386-2017
Date of decision: 23.10.2017
Shanker Singh
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. JS Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, AAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
CRM-M-11386-2017 -2-
According to the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar, the compromise between the parties is without any fear, pressure, threat or coercion and out of their free will.
October 23, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2017.10.24 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C. prayer for quashing of FIR under compromise应予准许.
Whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings should be quashed in light of a valid compromise.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shanker Singh
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
